Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Little Owl
‹ PreviousAvian GalleryNext ›

Little Owl

by Ron McCombe

Gallery: AvianPosted December 3, 2009157 views5 comments
I took this photograph a couple of years ago. I was working and visiting a commercial vegetable grower, in one of the large green houses worker who I knew came to me and said there was an owl on the lettuces. so I grabbed the camera with the 100-400 zoom lens and went to see it

It just sat and looked at me, I thought I was being supper cool creeping up the owl with out disturbing it. But it turns out it wasn't very well and finished up at the vets. But I got a series of pictures and this close cropped on is the one I like best.

Its a little soft on the right eye, and there's a little bit of green on the left.

I'd like to know what people think of the close crop

100-400 lens (400mm), 1/50se, f5.6, ISO 400

Comments

5 comments
Comment posted by Craig Strand on December 3, 2009 at 1:56 PM
I like this closeup portrait view Ron. The eye's really make it, wonderful catchlight along with his intense stare. Great Job!
Registered on March 30, 2008, 416 Posts, 2885 Comments
Comment posted by Bryan Hix on December 3, 2009 at 8:01 PM
I don't mind the green at all. Awesome stare. :toast:
Registered on June 13, 2008, 117 Posts, 755 Comments
Comment posted by Mia McPherson on December 3, 2009 at 8:29 PM
Ron,

I don't mind the intimacy of this portrait, it does focus attention on the owl's great eyes.

I may have taken this with more dof though, but even at ISO 400 your shutter speed was pretty slow, so that may not have been possible. For shots with this kind of light I've pushed my ISO to as high as 1000 and been satisfied with the results. Not sure which Canon you are shooting with though and if you could push the ISO that high.

The eyes sure draw me into the image.
Registered on June 25, 2007, 491 Posts, 12566 Comments
Comment posted by Ákos Lumnitzer on December 4, 2009 at 3:38 PM
Nice and close. :smile: Owls are just simply my favorite birds of all species.

To get a bit more DOF, I would have used manual mode with flash as main light (even the built-in would have sufficed) and stop down a few more stops. Despite what a lot of people say and condemn flash on nocturnal birds I have not ever found it to be a concern or detrimental to the birds' ability to behave naturally in my personal field experience. Although it's not something I would use recklessly either. But if an opportunity presents itself I would take it.

Congrats! :smile:
Registered on April 24, 2004, 25 Posts, 510 Comments
Comment posted by Ron Dudley on December 5, 2009 at 9:06 AM
Really interesting details here Ron, esp beak, rictal bristles and eyes. Agree about the DOF. I have a whole series like this of a Short-eared Owl who let me get very close on a very cold morning but I didn't have the DOF I should have either. Could kick myself...

Personally, I wouldn't have even considered flashing this owl.
Registered on March 30, 2007, 437 Posts, 10915 Comments