Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Redwoods In Fog
‹ PreviousLandscape GalleryNext ›

Redwoods In Fog

by Dan Baumbach

Gallery: LandscapePosted August 3, 20043,913 views17 comments
I've been in love with the redwoods ever since my first trip to northern California about 30 years ago. Photographing them has not been so easy though. Every so often I get inspired to try again. Here's one of my recent efforts. I'm a little wary about posting it on the web because it's one of those photos that I feel look better the bigger it is. Then it can transport you there.

Have I been successful. Let me know.

Shen-Hao 4x5
150 mm Nikkor f/5.6 @f/32
Ektachrome G

- Dan.

Comments

17 comments
Comment posted by Prashant Khapane on August 4, 2004 at 4:48 AM
Yes, you do! :cool: The darkness and the fog, the verticle lines all work well here. :toast:
Registered on November 1, 2003, 492 Posts, 4580 Comments
Comment posted by Youssef Ismail on August 4, 2004 at 5:47 AM
Dan,

I think you did a good job of capturing the feel of the redwoods in fog. It does have anice mood to it. The more I look at it, the more I like it.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 474 Posts, 5555 Comments
Comment posted by Jim Erhardt on August 4, 2004 at 7:50 AM
Dan, I like it! I think this web presentation of the image works well - I can feel myself there!

BTW, what is the equivalent focal length in 35mm?
Registered on November 1, 2003, 245 Posts, 2421 Comments
Comment posted by Klaus Bombach on August 4, 2004 at 8:14 AM
Very well captured. The mood is great and I like your composition a lot. My only small nit is the light URC. Cropping right a little bit would help.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 103 Posts, 430 Comments
Comment posted by Michel Legendre on August 4, 2004 at 9:27 AM
Hi Dan.
This one certainly transport me right there in the woods.
I'm sure it would be stronger with a big print.
Very nice to see your work.

Salut
Registered on November 1, 2003, 93 Posts, 668 Comments
Comment posted by Robert Ludwick on August 4, 2004 at 9:55 AM
Dan,

Very nice image and a moody one too. I like it a lot. I would lose the sliver of light in the upper right.

Jim, to get the equivalent focal lengths for bigger formats, divide by these factors:

6x7/2
4x5/3
5x7/4
8x10/6

In Dan's case it would be 50mm.

Bob Ludwick
Registered on November 8, 2003, 51 Posts, 407 Comments
Comment posted by Randy Beacham on August 4, 2004 at 10:00 AM
Hi Dan, this photo really shines. The understory vegetation has a glowing look to it under the darker redwoods. I also like how the larger trees frame the younger forest, a nice contrast that adds great depth. I'm curious about Ektachrome G too, what its color tendencies and contrast is like. Randy
Registered on January 7, 2004, 53 Posts, 304 Comments
Comment posted by Guy Tal on August 4, 2004 at 10:35 AM
Wow, Dan. This is moody and beautiful. It's my favorite kind of coastal woods scene and is perfectly captured here. Bravo!
Registered on November 1, 2003, 566 Posts, 15507 Comments
Comment posted by Dan Baumbach on August 4, 2004 at 11:11 AM
Jim,

I'd say that the 150mm lens is closer to 45mm on a 35mm. Still in the normal lens range. I multiply by 10 and divide by three.

Randy,

I really like Ektachrome G. It's less contrasty and saturated than Velvia 50 which is what I've been shooting when it's low ISO is not a problem. I've also been shooting Astia 100F and I've found its color a little dull at ISO 100 but nice when pushed 1 stop. Ektachrome G processed normal is less contrasty than Astia pushed 1 stop and just a teeny bit cooler. I like it color palette. The Kodak Readyloads don't work in a Fuji Quickload holder so I need a separate holder and the Kodak one is much more finiky. I also like being able to support an American company.

I'm glad that you see in this photo what I see.

Thank you to all.

- Dan.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 473 Posts, 7980 Comments
Comment posted by Dan Baumbach on August 4, 2004 at 11:18 AM
I'm aware of the URC and was going to write something about it in my initial presentation. Since I do most of my work for sale of framed prints, I knew that that small piece would be covered by the matt so I didn't crop it out.

- Dan.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 473 Posts, 7980 Comments
Comment posted by Mark Hudon on August 4, 2004 at 1:41 PM
Dan, very, very nice.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 315 Posts, 2246 Comments
Comment posted by Gloria Hopkins on August 4, 2004 at 2:29 PM
Just beautiful Dan :smile:
Registered on November 1, 2003, 19 Posts, 324 Comments
Comment posted by Jim Hutchison on August 4, 2004 at 3:30 PM
I find the picture really does draw me in - it's very inviting in it's attraction.

Thanks for sharing.
Registered on August 3, 2004, 20 Posts, 170 Comments
Comment posted by Michael Schlansker on August 4, 2004 at 9:02 PM
Dan, this is simply excellent.

My trips to the redwoods have been mostly unproductive. This helps provide some goals for my next trip.
Registered on November 12, 2003, 32 Posts, 394 Comments
Comment posted by Andy Biggs on August 5, 2004 at 9:42 AM
Great image, Dan. I love the soft light of fog. I think a slight crop off of the right hand side to eliminate the light the attracts my eyes in that direction. Very cool shot!
Registered on December 5, 2003, 8 Posts, 32 Comments
Comment posted by Eric Fredine on August 5, 2004 at 10:54 AM
This absolutely works Dan. I'm especially enjoying the foggy depth created by the three larger trunks in the foregound and the smaller trunks in the background. A classic redwoods scene.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 148 Posts, 1464 Comments
Comment posted by Phillip Noll on August 5, 2004 at 9:22 PM
I like it! I spent a week in May '04 in the Redwoods. Everyone told me how foggy it is there and that I will no doubt get some nice fog pictures. There was no fog. None! No rhodadendron flowers either! Just have to go back, I guess. I fell in love with the Redwoods and can't wait to go back. A very comforting place.

I would crop the right side a tiny bit as the URC is bothersome. I would use the tree on the right side as a visual boundary to prevent a viewer's wandering eye from leaving the photo.

I would love to see a large print of this. :cool:

Registered on November 17, 2003, 207 Posts, 1083 Comments