Arch Angel Falls
by Jim Greenwood
I realize that the quantity of posts from the Left Fork and the Narrows this season is bordering on the extreme, but ...
I've been working diligently on the processing for this composition and am interested in getting your comments and suggestions. Thanks.
Canon 5DII
Canon 16-35mm f/2.8L II
17mm, f/22, 13 seconds, ISO 50, polarizer, .9 GND filter
Comments
50 commentsDavid M. Cobb
Beautiful capture. I guess maybe I am the only one thinking this but your processing looks a little heavy handed to me. The colors and contrast are a little strong in your background for my tastes. Also, you have a significant amount of clipping at the base of your ripples in the foreground. Totally cosmetic and usually an easy fix - just something I am very nit picky about when photographing water. Thanks for sharing. Michael
John
If I ever photograph waterfalls, etc., I'm going to do a selection of shutter speeds so I can please everyone !!!
I do like the composition and, as Stan said, the warmth.
the fisch
Well done.
A few things unwillingly pull my eye and attention however. First, the dominant tree in the BG doesn't seem to have enough space above it. Secondly, you seem to have lost some highlight detail at the base of the falls, it is not even the brightness of these that bother me, it is the loss of important detail. Lastly, I think you could have lost an 1/8 off the bottom, and gained an 1/8 at the top for a more balance composition.
Shane
It appears that the people have spoken, so what more can I say. My only nit is the water cascading off the ledges in the immediate FG appears a bit dull to me.
Congrats on the EP!
Sandy r
But Jim, IMO you´ve gone really wide on this