Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
The Unfortunate Salmon
‹ PreviousWildlife GalleryNext ›

The Unfortunate Salmon

by Marsel van Oosten

Gallery: WildlifePosted April 2, 20091,545 views29 comments
This was shot on the tidal flats of Katmai National Park, Alaska, during the salmon run. One late afternoon on the last day of the workshop, the sun appeared from below the clouds just when high tide had flooded the tidal flats and the bears had come down to chase the salmon. We had positioned ourselves with the sun to our side and just followed the action in front of us. When this large bear caught a salmon right in front of us, it raised its head and turned it towards the low sun - perfectly trained! :smile:

Jpeg compression has ruined a lot of the fine detail in the small version - please check out the larger one as well.

Nikon D2Xs, AF-S 600/4.0, 1/800 @ f/8, ISO 400, tripod

Comments

29 comments
Comment posted by Jagdeep Rajput on April 2, 2009 at 10:06 AM
Great Bear, Great Fish, Great light & splashing water!
I love everything about this picture, the only nit is coming wave in the middle of the frame but you couldn't do anything about it.
Jagdeep Rajput :toast:
PS: Forgot to mention...blood driping from the mouth of fish!
Registered on April 29, 2008, 686 Posts, 2857 Comments
Comment posted by Marsel van Oosten on April 2, 2009 at 10:11 AM
Thanks Jagdeep - but it's not a wave, it's simply the oof water in the foreground. The water was hardly deep enough for the salmon to swim in, let alone for waves to form. :wink:
Registered on March 9, 2004, 285 Posts, 2277 Comments
Comment posted by Subharghya Das on April 2, 2009 at 10:56 AM
I love the Action here !!! Splashing Water .. Dripping Water ... Spurting Blood ... Absolutely Dramatic Moment :toast:
Registered on March 18, 2009, 26 Posts, 195 Comments
Comment posted by Ron Richins on April 2, 2009 at 11:01 AM
Thank goodness for the large version. I'm amazed at how large that paw is. Also, the blood path from the fish tells quite a story. Great action shot.
Registered on March 6, 2008, 113 Posts, 1009 Comments
Comment posted by Floris van Breugel on April 2, 2009 at 1:36 PM
Spectacular! The blood dripping from the salmon is incredible, along with everything else. Well done!
Registered on December 19, 2008, 306 Posts, 4840 Comments
Comment posted by Vincent Grafhorst on April 2, 2009 at 2:48 PM
Marsel, this simply unbelievable... How can we critique an image like this? All I can say is :eek:
This is easily one of the best wildlife photos I have ever seen! Thanks for sharing, you have outperformed yourself again. :toast:
Registered on February 24, 2006, 504 Posts, 7203 Comments
Comment posted by Ian Mason on April 2, 2009 at 6:23 PM
Another stunning wildlife image! I think the low viewpoint makes it work so well.
Registered on December 14, 2005, 399 Posts, 2305 Comments
Comment posted by Eoghain Maclean. on April 2, 2009 at 6:53 PM
An amazing shot and a pleasure to view.
Registered on March 22, 2009, 14 Posts, 14 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Sharp on April 2, 2009 at 11:29 PM
Simply excellent.
Registered on December 9, 2007, 258 Posts, 9892 Comments
Comment posted by Doug Roane on April 3, 2009 at 3:22 AM
incredible moment, and perfectly captured! what a great shot!
Registered on December 12, 2008, 213 Posts, 2226 Comments
Comment posted by Jorne de Bruin on April 3, 2009 at 6:07 AM
Absolutely horrible image! That poor Salmon being killed, way too graphic! :biggrin: :wink:


All kidding aside, looks like you caputured one of those perfect moments in nature a perfect way, another one for on the wall!

Just out of curiosity, how does the 'normal' public view this image (meaning non-photographers), and by that I mean the squirting blood? I've heard a lot of complaints about 'graphic' images in the past, I get the impression a lot of people only want to see the good side of nature and not the reality of kill of be killed. ( Apperently a Golden Eagle ripping the intestines out of a Hare is distastefull :confused: )
Registered on June 26, 2008, 178 Posts, 2136 Comments
Comment posted by Pramod Viswanath on April 3, 2009 at 6:49 AM
My back aches big time! Will be visiting my chiropractor, the moment I close this window. I second Vincent - you have simply outperformed yourself. Love the details in the larger version a lot! :jump: :jump: :jump:
Registered on December 4, 2008, 60 Posts, 697 Comments
Comment posted by Richard Peters on April 3, 2009 at 8:03 AM
The larger image really shows the incredible detail :toast: :toast: :toast:
Registered on December 22, 2005, 28 Posts, 126 Comments
Comment posted by Julia Flanagan on April 3, 2009 at 1:55 PM
Beauty Marsel! Nothing to critique here, but as I look at it I wonder if you used some negative auto compensation? I'm trying to imagine myself taking a shot of the same scene and I can easily see me blowing out the hightlights of water, the bear's lighter fur and the salmon. Can you give some insight as to how you exposed for this shot?

Julie
Registered on November 13, 2003, 59 Posts, 986 Comments
Comment posted by Rick Gomez on April 3, 2009 at 2:42 PM
Your images really make me yell "Whoa!", all to myself in my little office. My wife thinks there's something wrong with me, lol.
Freaking AMAZING shot! :toast: :jump:

Like Julie, I too would love some insight on how you exposed this... It does seem like a tricky exposure.
Registered on March 3, 2007, 206 Posts, 1853 Comments
Comment posted by Brad Hill on April 4, 2009 at 8:55 AM
Hi Marsel,

Excellent shot. If there's one single thing that "really does it for me" with this shot, it's the bear's right paw - love how the claws are visible just above the water...

Cheers...thanks for sharing this great shot...

Brad
Registered on May 29, 2007, 431 Posts, 6061 Comments
Comment posted by Ganesh H Shankar on April 5, 2009 at 6:44 AM
The drama very well freezed in time. Excellent image Marsel :wavey:
Registered on March 1, 2004, 324 Posts, 1867 Comments
Comment posted by Marsel van Oosten on April 5, 2009 at 11:12 AM
Just out of curiosity, how does the 'normal' public view this image (meaning non-photographers), and by that I mean the squirting blood? I've heard a lot of complaints about 'graphic' images in the past, I get the impression a lot of people only want to see the good side of nature and not the reality of kill of be killed.


So many people, so many opinions - there are those that only want to see nature as being a big happy place, and there are those that like to see nature as it really is: wild. I'm always a little surprised when I hear people complain about nature images being too graphic; most movies, videogames and newspapers feature way more graphic images, and it doesn't seem to bother the vast majority of people one bit. Violence, death and destruction is part of life on earth, whether you like it or not. If you don't, you can just look the other way and pretend it's not there. :smile: However, it also depends on your audience - when I show wildlife images to children, I'd leave out the graphic ones.

Beauty Marsel! Nothing to critique here, but as I look at it I wonder if you used some negative auto compensation?


In this case I just used Matrix metering - the whole scene is evenly lit and the bear is not large enough in the frame to trick the meter into overexposure. Had the bear been closer, I would have switched to manual exposure, locking the exposure for the background. It's ok for shadow areas to get really dark, but you should always prevent highlights from blowing out.
Registered on March 9, 2004, 285 Posts, 2277 Comments
Comment posted by Allan Whiteman on April 5, 2009 at 11:52 PM
AMAZING..probably a once in a lifetime shot. Wonderful lighting/detail/action!
Registered on March 10, 2009, 12 Posts, 13 Comments
Comment posted by Greg Cope on April 6, 2009 at 4:54 PM
Marsel, your photos are always beyond top notch, and this one is no exception. Outstanding work.
Registered on January 22, 2007, 212 Posts, 2737 Comments
Comment posted by Charlie VanTassel on April 6, 2009 at 8:07 PM
Incredible, Marsel. Congratulations on the EP! :toast: :toast:
Registered on October 18, 2006, 644 Posts, 4801 Comments
Comment posted by Dan Walters on April 6, 2009 at 9:20 PM
Great shot! I love the light and the water coming off the bear.
Registered on October 30, 2005, 405 Posts, 3693 Comments
Comment posted by Doug Benner on April 6, 2009 at 10:35 PM
Wonderful capture. Congratulations.
Registered on December 8, 2003, 482 Posts, 1868 Comments
Comment posted by Vincent Grafhorst on April 7, 2009 at 12:21 AM
Although there have been a number of good and interesting posts this week in the Fauna gallery, this image clearly stood out and rightfully attracted a lot of attention. This is truly a jaw-dropping action photo that depicts the cruelty of nature, yet it does so in an artistic manner. Composition, lighting, animal poses, background, angle of view, and details such as splashing blood and water, all is in perfect harmony in this image. Like I said previously in my comment above Marsel, you have outperformed yourself once again! Therewith setting the bar very high for all wildlife photographers out there, including you. :toast:
Registered on February 24, 2006, 504 Posts, 7203 Comments
Comment posted by Stan Rose on April 7, 2009 at 12:33 AM
Wow, sweet shot...the drops of blood are definitely the highlite here, that's just pure art! :biggrin:
Registered on September 15, 2005, 836 Posts, 17099 Comments
Comment posted by Mitch Moraski on April 7, 2009 at 9:10 AM
This is about as perfect as it gets. Great shot Marsel!! Perfect light, splashing water, that front paw showing the claws on these massive animals...great focus. Nice job!!
Registered on August 3, 2008, 105 Posts, 590 Comments
Comment posted by Kent Mearig on April 8, 2009 at 1:06 AM
Rods and reels are for sissies. Catch it in your mouth. Congrats on the WP.
Registered on September 4, 2006, 237 Posts, 4748 Comments
Comment posted by Ajit Huilgol on April 11, 2009 at 1:36 AM
OMG! This is serious Nat Geo stuff! :toast: Thanks for the larger image; it's got much greater detail in the bear's body that is missing on the smaller one. :toast:
Registered on December 19, 2008, 302 Posts, 2055 Comments
Comment posted by Nick Bristol on January 3, 2012 at 9:54 AM
Can't believe I didn't see this before! Just fantastic!

Nick Bristol
Lone Rock, WI
Registered on February 1, 2004, 752 Posts, 14140 Comments